Election 08: America's Ultimate Racial Litmus Test?
Here's an excerpt from a recent article from Onenewsnow.com:
Regarding that poll: "There are a lot fewer bigots than there were 50 years ago, but that doesn't mean there's only a few bigots," said Stanford political scientist Paul Sniderman who helped analyze the exhaustive survey.
Such thinking is only fueled by articles such as this one from Jacob Weisberg of Newsweek magazine (that bastion of left-wing liberalism):
But he is not alone. Consider these words from CNN's Jack Cafferty:
And then there's CNN's Roland Martin who said:
So is that the bottom line? Is a vote for McCain an act of racism? Or is it possible to reject Obama - not because he is black - but because he is ...
Green? - far and away the least qualified candidate in modern history, or ...
Pink? - as close to overt socialism as any American candidate EVER, or ...
Chameleon? - ever adapting to wherever he finds himself and to whatever audience he addresses...
... or could it simply be that you find his big-government proposals frightening, his politics of "hope" and "change" vapid, his promises to groups like America's largest purveyor of abortions, "Planned Parenthood" (what a horrific oxymoron) appalling, and the prospect of him choosing as many as three future supreme court justices catastrophic?
Maybe you simply think he is not America's best choice for president.
Is that racist?
A political scientist at a Christian college in New York City warns that if Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama loses the election on November 4, race riots could break out in large U.S. cities.
A recent Associated Press-Yahoo News poll suggested Senator Obama's race could cost him up to six percentage points on election night. David Corbin, a politics professor at The King's College, contends there is potential for public riots the night of or after the election, if Obama's lead in the polls does not translate into victory. "I don't think that's something that we've looked at very closely, and I think that this could be a powder keg here as we get towards that day, given that Senator Obama is an African-American and given that there might be some backlash if he actually loses," Corbin explains. Corbin notes that seemingly small stories involving O.J. Simpson and Rodney King have brought into play terrible riots in major cities across the U.S. "I think a lot of people are looking to an Obama presidency to affirm the notion that somehow Americans aren't racist and, if for some reason Senator Obama loses, then it's just, 'Oh well, it's said and done. We must be a racist nation,'"
Corbin adds.
Regarding that poll: "There are a lot fewer bigots than there were 50 years ago, but that doesn't mean there's only a few bigots," said Stanford political scientist Paul Sniderman who helped analyze the exhaustive survey.
Such thinking is only fueled by articles such as this one from Jacob Weisberg of Newsweek magazine (that bastion of left-wing liberalism):
"If Obama loses, our children will grow up thinking of equal opportunity as a myth. His defeat would say that when handed a perfect opportunity to put the worst part of our history behind us, we chose not to. In this event, the world's judgment will be severe and inescapable: the United States had its day, but in the end couldn't put its own self-interest ahead of its crazy irrationality over race."
But he is not alone. Consider these words from CNN's Jack Cafferty:
"Race is arguably the biggest issue in this election, and it’s one that nobody’s talking about. The differences between Barack Obama and John McCain couldn’t be more well-defined. Obama wants to change Washington. McCain is a part of Washington and a part of the Bush legacy. Yet the polls remain close. Doesn’t make sense…unless it’s race." (emphasis mine)
And then there's CNN's Roland Martin who said:
"For all the talk about inclusion and the historic nature of this campaign, the true tribal feelings of so many people will come into play, whether we want to admit it or not." - and - "It's wonderful to talk about the economy, immigration, the war in Iraq, health care and education, but we can't be naïve to the reality that when voters go into that voting booth, they will, as one person told me during an interview, 'vote with their tribe.'"
So is that the bottom line? Is a vote for McCain an act of racism? Or is it possible to reject Obama - not because he is black - but because he is ...
Green? - far and away the least qualified candidate in modern history, or ...
Pink? - as close to overt socialism as any American candidate EVER, or ...
Chameleon? - ever adapting to wherever he finds himself and to whatever audience he addresses...
... or could it simply be that you find his big-government proposals frightening, his politics of "hope" and "change" vapid, his promises to groups like America's largest purveyor of abortions, "Planned Parenthood" (what a horrific oxymoron) appalling, and the prospect of him choosing as many as three future supreme court justices catastrophic?
Maybe you simply think he is not America's best choice for president.
Is that racist?

